Advertisement

Everett Public Schools joins other districts in announcing pending budget cuts

By the end of 2022, the Everett School District is projected to be about $23 million in the red without increased state funding or budget cuts. In spring 2019, the district is looking to cut the 2019-20 budget by 2 percent – or approximately $6.5 million.

From an Everett Public Schools news release.

By the end of 2022, the Everett School District is projected to be about $23 million in the red without increased state funding or budget cuts.

Everett Public Schools has a long record of strong financial management. This fall, the district was honored to have once again been awarded a Certificate of Excellence from the Association of School Business Officials International. Only three other school districts in Washington earned the award this year.

In addition, Everett Public Schools has earned one of the highest bond ratings in the state for public schools. Moody’s upgraded the district’s rating in 2016 from Aa2 to Aa1. This September, Standard and Poor’s affirmed their AA+/stable long-term credit rating of the district. Great ratings translate into better interest rates which equals savings for taxpayers.

Superior financial stewardship is cumulative. It is built over the long haul and allows the district to continue to spend more money on teaching and teaching support (teachers, paraeducators, teacher-librarians, supplies, health services, etc.) than most school districts its size. For example, the district spent 73.5 percent of its budget on teaching in 2016-17 compared to the average of 71.4 percent.

“This exceptional financial management prepared us well as we face new budget challenges in the upcoming years,” stated Jeff Moore, Executive Director of Finance and Business Services.

At issue is millions of dollars in increased funding from the state that came as part of the so-called “McCleary Fix” – the state’s response to a 2012 state Supreme Court ruling the state was not adequately funding basic education.

Although the Legislature provided extra funding for school employee compensation this year through the McCleary decision, legislators also reduced the amount school districts could collect through the local operating levy, as well as underfunding vital programs like special education.

There are other funding gaps from the state including:

  • The state allocates $353,000 for health services, but the district costs are $2.1 million.
  • There is no state funding for school resource officers, and the district pays $320,000.
  • Additional student and staff safety and security costs $3.95 million, and the state only funds $417,000.

This lack of funding, if not fixed in the upcoming legislative session, will result in a shortfall in the district’s 2019-20 budget. The shortfall will make it necessary to develop budget cuts this spring, as seen in other Washington school districts. Several surrounding school districts have already started announcing their plans for budget cuts. Once the Legislature makes its decisions this winter, district staff can better determine the extent of the budget shortfall.

This spring, the district is looking to cut the 2019-20 budget by 2 percent – or approximately $6.5 million. The following year the cut could be an additional $11.5 million.

Reducing a budget by $6.5 million for 2019-20 could affect entire programs and is likely to include layoffs, although we are not certain how many at this time. If layoffs are necessary, the district will work with affected staff to ensure as much notice as possible is given. Some reductions could come through attrition or by not filling vacant positions.

Everett Public Schools Superintendent Gary Cohn stated, “The school board is asking the Legislature to modify the levy cap, which was reduced by the Legislature to $1,500 per student from the voter-approved $2,500, fully fund special education by increasing the per-student funding and reducing the threshold to access safety net funding, and fully fund the new School Employees Benefit Board (SEBB) system, which is scheduled to take over benefits administration in January 2020.”

These McCleary-related “fixes” are essential for school districts to avoid substantial budget reductions going into next year and the following year.

Tags: 

Comments

Thank you “News of Mill Creek" (not)

Thank you “News of Mill Creek” for regurgitating exactly the party line from our local mismanaged school district without any analysis or commentary.

You and the Everett School District fail to mention that the paper tiger school district teacher contract negotiators rolled over and played dead this past summer (just 3 months ago) while the Everett Teachers Union demanded and received a whopping 20% increase to the already highest paid teachers in the state.

And now the Everett School District is whining about how they just don’t have adequate funds to run their public institution and they need more money.

Told you so

Hello Concerned Citizens. May I call you by your first name?

I believe you are mistaken. Back in February, well, it was February. That was before the big heist that occurred this past summer led by the Everett School District’s Teachers Union.

Back in February I wrote about the upcoming school bond and how the Everett School District is mismanaging hard earned taxpayer funds.

On September 9th, I wrote another letter to the editor describing how the Everett School District just agreed to a 20% increase in teacher salaries even though teachers here were already the highest paid teachers in the state and even though the district knew it could not sustain that $26M increase in costs (from that raise) to the district. In my September letter, I described how Everett would soon start discussing layoffs.

http://www.newsofmillcreek.com/content/everett-school-districts-teacher-contract-negotiations-2018

Now, 3 months later, the district is crying about how they expect to be $6M short this coming year and $15M or so the following year - and they want yet more money and they want it now. Otherwise (if we don’t agree to their extortion demands) they will have to layoff personnel.

So clearly they can’t do simple arithmetic. They should not have “negotiated” the $26M that was not going to be part of continuing revenue. And they are now using the threat of layoffs as I described in September.

I am glad you are Concerned. I’m concerned too.

Our featured sponsor

Google matched content

Google ad